Description
The addition of the second in-street pedestrian sign here this spring was a noticeable improvement to this intersection's safety. Now it's back down to only one in-street sign. This is a wide, dangerous intersection with drivers rushing down Trumbull Street to and from the highway entrances. Please bring back that second in-street sign!
10 Comments
Anonymous (Guest)
David Streever (Registered User)
I think RFID has problems with range, doesn't it? I think without an investment in the 10s of thousands you are looking at 50 feet. Maybe a GPS/LoJack is the way to go? I know you can buy a GPS transponder for roughly 150, plus the service charge.
the only problem is that a criminal may be smart enough to look for it (especially if we post about it in SCF). It would have to be integrated with the overall sign in some way.
I think a camera is probably the cheapest/best way of catching the theft of the signs.
Rob Rocke (Registered User)
CT Livable Streets Campaign (Registered User)
Anonymous (Guest)
ADIは、 Department of Transportation, Traffic and Parking (Registered User)
Rob Rocke (Registered User)
CT Livable Streets Campaign (Registered User)
Où vont les cons quand ils sont morts? (Guest)
Some of the signs get run over and destroyed, but the city should have more of these signs, in reserve, to immediately replace the signs that are stolen or destroyed.
Content blocked by rejections (Registered User)
Hausladen helped.