Descrizione
AT&T, while it is awesome that you are in town, you are not the best caretaker of your parking lots. you did trim the weeds a bit recently, but it still looks pretty awful.
maybe you have more space than you need? cars are never parked all the way up to the state street side. how about you convert it to a park where your staff can eat lunch outside? or donate some space to the city for a park? all that dead space helps make that stretch of state street feel like a wasteland.
25 Commentos
juli (Utente registrato)
Citizen (Utente registrato)
East Rockette (Ospite)
CT Livable Streets Campaign (Utente registrato)
I agree with "NHV." The city has looked at this lot for new buildings in the past, including an extension of the Audubon "arts district" that combines mixed-use office, housing and retail activities.
This lot would be a great site for a nonprofit community-run housing coop with a mix of market-rate housing, affordable housing, live-work loft spaces, and retail and office space at the corners. This creates a 24/7 community that adds a lot of character and activity to the neighborhood, in a sustainable way that transitions between the downtown business district and the East Rock neighborhood. There are many great examples in Minneapolis and San Francisco that our planners could learn from. Some of the AT&T parking can be transferred elsewhere (or partially underground) and the need for it reduced using demand management (TDM) strategies.
I agree with Juli that a massive parking lot does nothing for the city except add to pollution. For now, it should at least be better-maintained.
Anonymous (Ospite)
CT Livable Streets Campaign (Utente registrato)
I agree that the FBI building has dramatically limited the potential of this area (and several blocks in each direction, in fact), and was a huge mistake. However it isn't hopeless if better decisions can be made going forward. There are plenty of suburban fortress designs in thriving, central areas of other cities.
Significantly narrowing State Street so that retail and housing could survive on both sides of the street would mitigate the negative impact of the FBI building. The city has looked into this because of the incredible economic potential of land located so close to train stations.
Chiusa Jeffery100York (Ospite)
Reopened juli (Utente registrato)
Anonymous (Ospite)
Reopened GregL (Utente registrato)
Anonymous (Ospite)
Pedro Soto (Utente registrato)
The big sticking point with this is AT&T. They have stated in no uncertain terms that if they were to lose their precious surface lot, or even if they were forced to build structured parking (a garage), they would leave New Haven.
Whether this is just bluster or a real threat, it's the reason why the new arts high school did not materialize here, or any development has occurred, since obviously it would be a disaster if AT&T left.
My hope is that once the surrounding land becomes more developed and more valuable, the lot would become too desirable for development, and things may change.
Just to get a sense of history, this lot has always been a bit of a dead spot. Before the parking lot, this was the site of the warehouse for the Register, and parking for all of it's delivery trucks.
The FBI building was the site of the long-lost New Haven arena, which was demolished in the early 70's.
I agree that narrowing the road and re-opening both sides of the street to development need to happen over the next few years. This used to be the busiest section of New Haven and now it's a ghostland between Wooster and downtown.
FYI, current plans for the lot south of the FBI building are for a parking garage (not a mixed use, just a plain garage without a liner building) for that site. This would be to support the hotel that would open in the Wachovia building on Elm and Church.
THAT would almost certainly stop mixed development cold, so it bears keeping an eye out on that as well.
CT Livable Streets Campaign (Utente registrato)
Thanks, Pedro. If you hear about the plans for that moving forward, please post them here.
Another plain garage, with no facade treatment, in the middle of a dense downtown is not acceptable unless for some reason we want New Haven to start looking like the underpass of I-84 in Hartford.
Jason Stockmann (Utente registrato)
juli (Utente registrato)
juli (Utente registrato)
juli (Utente registrato)
Jonathan Hopkins (Ospite)
Jonathan Hopkins (Ospite)
Jonathan Hopkins (Ospite)
Citizen (Utente registrato)
Did you actually say that the FBI building's got to go? Roads and sidewalks are waaaay more flexible than buildings. You can widen or narrow roads. You can add more sidewalk, twitch around in a few different ways. But you can't take a building and just destroy it because you don't like how it's set up.
Take out the parking lot, put a lawn there with a nice fountain. Bam, just saved over 100 million dollars, and improved city beautification at the same time!
Jason Stockmann (Utente registrato)
AT&T should bear in mind that healthy urban fabric, walkable and bikable streets, and mixed use developments have been known to attract the demographic that is know to sign up for lucrative iPhone data plans.
Don't they want to grow their local market share by making New Haven more urban and vibrant?
CT Livable Streets Campaign (Utente registrato)
Nice drawings, Jonathan.
To be fair, Jonathan's comment was that the FBI *eventually* has got to go, as in, perhaps 30 or 50 years from now. I don't think anyone expects a building like that to last forever, especially when it is so viciously disrespectful of its surrounding urban fabric.
harleyinnewhaven (Ospite)
Chiusa City of New Haven (Ufficialità verificata)